主页 > 国内 >

快乐男声

《防诈骗保障法案》内政部邀民提出意见_我的网站

灌篮高手

一 | BOISE, Idaho -- An Idaho law restricting which bathrooms transgender students can use in schools will go into effect while a court challenge plays out. Chief U.S. District Judge David Nye on Thursday denied a request by a plaintiff who is challenging the law to keep it from being enforced until the lawsuit is resolved, The Idaho Statesman reported. In August, Nye had placed the law on hold in August pending his decision.The law will go into effect 21 days after his ruling.It prohibits transgender students from using public school restrooms and locker rooms that align with their gender identity. It also allows other students to sue their school if they encounter a student using a bathroom that doesn’t align with their sex assigned at birth. Nye said the plaintiff failed to show their challenge would succeed. He noted the law is “substantially related to the government’s important interest in protecting the privacy and safety of students” while using a restroom or a changing room. Lambda Legal, which represents LGBTQ+ people in lawsuits, sued the state in July on behalf of an Idaho transgender student, arguing that the law known as Senate Bill 1100 unconstitutionally discriminates against students based on their gender identities.“Although it likely comes as little solace to Idaho’s transgender students who, as a result of the court’s decision today, may have to change their routines, or who, regrettably, may face other societal hardships, the court must stay within its lane,” Nye wrote. “Its duty is to interpret the law; it is not a policy-making body.” The judge also denied the state’s request to dismiss the case, saying state attorneys sought to dismiss all of the lawsuit's claims in a “perfunctory manner, with little explanation.”School districts in Idaho currently regulate which bathrooms transgender students may use. About a quarter of Idaho schools allow transgender students to use restrooms and locker rooms that align with their gender identity, Nye said in a previous decision.Thursday's ruling puts transgender students directly in harm's way by stigmatizing them as outsiders in their own communities and depriving them of the basic ability to go about their school day like everyone else, Peter Renn, Lambda Legal senior counsel, said in a statement."The vast majority of courts ruling on similar discriminatory laws have struck them down, and the court’s decision here is an outlier that fails to respect the equal dignity of transgender students,” he said.Idaho Superintendent for Public Instruction Debbie Critchfield, members of the Idaho State Board of Education and members of the Boise School District’s board of trustees are defendants in the case. Idaho Attorney General Raúl Labrador in a statement called the ruling a significant win for his office.“Society has separated these intimate facilities for time immemorial, and it is particularly important that the safety and privacy interests of minor students are protected,” Labrador said.Republican Sen. Ben Adams, of Nampa, sponsored the measure, and the Idaho Family Policy Center, a religious lobbying group, helped write it. The group also pushed a new Idaho law criminalizing gender-affirming health care for minors.Many GOP-controlled states have passed similar anti-transgender laws.In August, a federal appeals court upheld a decision blocking Idaho’s 2020 first-in-the-nation ban on transgender athletes in girls and women’s sports. In that case, a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the ban discriminates against all women, citing a provision in the law that allows for anyone to dispute the sex of a female student athlete in Idaho. That provision would require the athlete to verify their gender through medical procedures, including gynecological exams.。（新加坡讯）新加坡内政部展开公众谘询，邀请公众对拟议中的《防诈骗保障法案》提出意见。这个法案将针对正蒙受诈骗却不肯相信当局的受害者，以授权警方暂时限制受害者的银行户头交易。新加坡内政部昨日发文告指出，当局将在未来几个月推出《防诈骗保障法案》（Protection from Scams Bill），法案将允许警方在有理由相信受害者会向诈骗团伙汇款时，向银行发出限制令（Restriction Orders，简称RO），限制受害者在一段时间内不能进行银行交易。新加坡警察部队8月22日公布2024年上半年诈骗和网络犯罪数据时指出，警方在这期间接获2万8751起这类罪案通报，诈骗案占了92.5%，达2万6587起，涉及金额达3亿8560万新元。

二 | 新加坡警察部队公布今年上半年诈骗和网络犯罪数据时指出，警方在这期间接获2万8751起这类罪案通报，诈骗案占了92.5%，达2万6587起，涉及金额达3亿8560万新元。其中，多达86%的骗案是受害者自行转交钱财，并非由骗子操控受害者的户头转账。这类受害者心理已被攻陷和操控，无法相信自己受骗。《联合早报》报导，新加坡内政部《防诈骗保障法案》的重点包括：限制令仅针对骗子没有实际接触受害者，而是采用数码或电讯网络（如电话、短信或线上通讯）进行的诈骗案。限制令将限制受害人的户头，通过线上银行、手机银行和柜台向外转账。不过，受害人可以向警方申请取出用于合法用途的款项（如维持日常生活、支付账单等）。限制令包括所有信用相关业务，包括信用卡交易，个人贷款，以避免骗子说服受害者代为申请信用额度或贷款。

三 | 限制令为期28天，这让警方有较充裕时间说服受害者，相信他正在受骗。28天后，警方将再次评估受害者是否有被骗风险，若有则可更新限制令；每次更新有效期仍是28天。

四 | 新加坡警方将只对7家国内系统重要性银行（Domestic Systematically Important Banks，简称D-SIB）发出限制令。这7家银行是星展银行、大华银行、华侨银行、汇丰银行、马来亚银行、渣打银行及花旗银行。新加坡内政部强调，发出限制令是迫不得已的防范诈骗手段。警方在有理由相信某人正成为诈骗犯的目标，并在可预见的未来向诈骗团伙转账，同时在其他说服受害者的选项已经用尽，而且未奏效的情况下，才会发出限制令。受害者可针对警方发出的限制令向内政部上诉，内政部将保有最后决定权。